UNAIR NEWS – The Indonesian government, through the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, and Technology (Kemendikti Saintek), has announced plans to establish a series of elite high schools aimed at preparing students for admission to top-tier universities. These schools, named Garuda Excellence High Schools, are planned to total 20 institutions, with completion targeted by 2029.
Responding to the proposal, Prof Dr Tuti Budirahayu Dra M Si a Sociology Education expert from Universitas Airlangga (UNAIR), has raised critical concerns. She argued that the project lacks a clear justification, as it is not based on comprehensive research or an accurate assessment of Indonesia’s educational needs.
Ambitious plan
Prof. Budirahayu characterized the initiative as highly ambitious and prestigious, particularly given its focus on rural and remote areas. She emphasized that instead of constructing new high-performing schools, the government should prioritize enhancing the quality of existing institutions and ensuring equitable access to education across all regions.
“In my view, there are several issues with the statements made by the Minister and Deputy Minister of Kemendikti Saintek. Their arguments tend to be inconsistent and even contradictory. The responsibility for high school development falls under the Ministry of Primary and Secondary Education, not Kemendikti Saintek, as high schools are within their jurisdiction,” she explained.
Focus on STEM
Prof. Budirahayu also criticized the exclusive emphasis on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) in the proposed curriculum for Garuda Excellence High Schools, warning that it risks diminishing students’ social awareness.
“It’s unreasonable to exclude social sciences. How can students develop sensitivity to local issues in their communities without a foundation in social, cultural, and political studies? Over time, this approach will weaken students’ sense of social responsibility,” she explained.
Additionally, the program’s “excellence” label inherently suggests exclusivity, as only high-achieving students would gain admission. This could exacerbate existing educational inequalities, leading to increased social disparities and discrimination.
“If the goal is to prepare students for top universities, the government should focus on identifying capable students and providing them with mentorship programs. Rather than constructing new schools, it would be more effective to improve the quality of current institutions. Bridging programs for high school students could also be introduced to better prepare them for higher education,” she concluded.
Author: Rifki Sunarsis Ari Adi
Editor: Khefti Al Mawalia
